ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Auditory imagery and poetry-elicited emotions: a study on the hard of hearing.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silent reading evokes auditory images of the written text, and there is emerging evidence that these images increase emotional arousal when reading poetry. A novel approach to studying their relevance to poetry-elicited emotions is to explore them in hard of hearing individuals, who may have difficulties generating mental images in this modality. In the present study, we investigated differences in auditory imagery, both as a dispositional trait and as a process that occurs during reading, and the intensity of poetry-elicited emotions between hard of hearing individuals and controls. We also explored whether the effect of hearing loss on arousal can be partially explained by the vividness of the auditory images evoked during reading. For this purpose, participants completed two sessions. First, they filled in a set of questionnaires concerning reading experience and dispositional traits. Second, they read poetry for 30 min, retrospectively rated their emotional responses to the poems and answered questions about socio-affective and cognitive processes during reading. Results showed that, although participants in the hard of hearing group scored significantly lower than controls on every measure of auditory imagery (i.e., trait auditory imagery, auditory imagery for words, and other sounds while reading), their emotions were no less intense. The hard of hearing group also reported lower levels of other dispositional traits (i.e., visual imagery and proneness to fantasizing), but not of any psychological processes during reading. Not much is known about the effects of mental imagery on poetry-elicited emotions, and our findings open a new and promising line of research for exploring their relevance and specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.