ArticleMethodsX2025
Simple and accessible methods for quantifying isolated mucins for further evaluation.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we present a detailed workflow for the isolation, quantitation, and evaluation of mucin proteins. These methods are applicable to a variety of biological, mucin-containing samples from the airways and other mucosal organ systems. While this report focuses on the salivary MUC5B protein from the respiratory system, the presented methodologies can be applied to other mucins, contributing to a broader application of these techniques. We used a simplified isopycnic centrifugation to purify and enrich MUC5B from human saliva. Isolated MUC5B was then subjected to a Bradford protein assay using a bovine submaxillary mucin (BSM) standard, which more accurately reflects the mucin concentration in our samples compared to a bovine serum albumin (BSA) standard. Additionally, we compare the mucin levels following quantitation using agarose polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Our findings show a near 2-fold increase in quantitation from the more representative, BSM standard, suggesting its importance for mucin studies. These methods support a wide range of experimental applications looking to assess mucins, thereby contributing to the broader field of mucin studies and advancing our understanding of the implications of mucins in health and disease.•A streamlined, one-step isopycnic ultracentrifugation to isolate MUC5B from human saliva•A Mucin Bradford assay that is modified from existing Bradford assay techniques to better quantitate mucin for mucin studies•An agarose-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis method used to visualize and confirm the isolation and quantitation of mucin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.