Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207064›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Simple and accessible methods for quantifying isolated mucins for further evaluation.

Hannah J McIntire-Ray, Elex S Rose, Stefanie Krick, Jarrod W Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah J McIntire-RayGregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Elex S RoseGregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Stefanie KrickGregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jarrod W BarnesGregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Funding

Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors in cystic fibrosis-associated airway inflammation and mucociliary dysfunctionR01HL160911 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Stefanie Krick · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Epigenetic Modulation of Cellular Senescence in the Cystic Fibrosis LungR01HL169253 · NHLBI · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI Stefanie Krick, Yan Sanders · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Training Program in Cell, Molecular, and Developmental BiologyT32GM146611 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Susan L Bellis · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL160911NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL169253NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM146611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we present a detailed workflow for the isolation, quantitation, and evaluation of mucin proteins. These methods are applicable to a variety of biological, mucin-containing samples from the airways and other mucosal organ systems. While this report focuses on the salivary MUC5B protein from the respiratory system, the presented methodologies can be applied to other mucins, contributing to a broader application of these techniques. We used a simplified isopycnic centrifugation to purify and enrich MUC5B from human saliva. Isolated MUC5B was then subjected to a Bradford protein assay using a bovine submaxillary mucin (BSM) standard, which more accurately reflects the mucin concentration in our samples compared to a bovine serum albumin (BSA) standard. Additionally, we compare the mucin levels following quantitation using agarose polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Our findings show a near 2-fold increase in quantitation from the more representative, BSM standard, suggesting its importance for mucin studies. These methods support a wide range of experimental applications looking to assess mucins, thereby contributing to the broader field of mucin studies and advancing our understanding of the implications of mucins in health and disease.•A streamlined, one-step isopycnic ultracentrifugation to isolate MUC5B from human saliva•A Mucin Bradford assay that is modified from existing Bradford assay techniques to better quantitate mucin for mucin studies•An agarose-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis method used to visualize and confirm the isolation and quantitation of mucin.

Indexed as

Agarose-polyacrylamide Gel electrophoresisAg-PAGEIsolation, Quantitation, and Evaluation of Salivary MUC5BIsopycnic ultracentrifugationMucin biologyMucin quantitationSalivary MUC5B

Identifiers

PMID40207064
PMCPMC11981757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.