ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Assessing diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease versus cognitively unimpaired individuals: P-tau217 emerges as the optimal marker in Chinese cohorts.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Plasma Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease Across the Continuum: A Systematic Review of SIMOA-Based Studies.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of plasma pTau217 in genetically admixed South American populations.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Value of lncRNA LINC00641 as a Potential Biomarker for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Elucidation of its Underlying Molecular Mechanism.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Article
- Screen, Sample, Stratify: Biomarkers and Machine Learning Compress Dementia Pathways.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Translating blood-based biomarkers into Alzheimer's disease clinical practice: screening, diagnosis, and longitudinal monitoring.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Simoa platform is recognized as a highly sensitive tool for detecting blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is extensively utilized in the diagnosis and identification of AD, with accuracy emerging as a pivotal metric for assessing assay performance, gradually gaining acceptance and application. The primary objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of multiple biomarkers in AD using the Simoa platform. The ultimate goal was to identify the optimal diagnostic biomarkers and further investigate their practical application value in the Chinese population. Methods: The study comprised two cohorts: cohort I consisted of 151 healthy controls and 90 AD patients, while cohort II was sourced from a Chinese population cohort, encompassing 123 healthy controls and 126 AD patients, utilizing publicly available data. All patients underwent plasma biomarker concentration measurements using the Simoa platform. The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of these biomarkers for AD diagnosis were compared to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy. Results: The findings revealed that plasma P-tau217 exhibited excellent performance in differentiating AD from healthy controls, with a sensitivity of 95.0%, specificity of 96.0%, and accuracy of 95.7% for AD diagnosis. Conversely, other indicators, including Aβ42, Aβ42/40, T-tau/Aβ42, P-tau217/Aβ42 and P-tau181, demonstrated some diagnostic efficacy but fell short of meeting the diagnostic criteria. Discussion: P-tau217 stands out as a highly effective biomarker for distinguishing AD from CUC, exhibiting extensive clinical application potential in the Chinese population. It presents a promising array of clinical prospects for the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.