ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Impact Assessment of an Educational Intervention Toward Rational Antibiotic Use Among Community Pharmacists in Nepal.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors related to community pharmacists' intention to provide collaborative deprescribing service for fall-risk medications in older adults: a factorial and theory-based cross-sectional study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- An Educational Intervention to Strengthen Community Pharmacy Practice in Nepal.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Educating community pharmacists (CPs) is an important step in promoting rational use of antibiotics. In this study, authors assessed the impact of an educational intervention on knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) related to rational antibiotic use among selected CPs in Kathmandu valley, Nepal and also obtained qualitative feedback. Methods: An educational intervention was conducted among 162 CPs. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and its causes, strategies to contain resistance and the role of community pharmacists in reducing AMR were discussed followed by problem solving exercises. Their KAP were assessed before (baseline), posttest (immediately after the intervention), and retention (2 weeks after the intervention) using a pre-validated tool. The quantitative data were analyzed using appropriate tests (p < 0.05). Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted after the follow-up, among six CPs to obtain their perspectives on the intervention and their role in combating AMR. Results: The majority (n = 118; 72.84%) had a "Diploma in Pharmacy" qualification. The median (IQR) knowledge scores were 9 (1), 9 (2), and 10 (0) during the pretest, post-test, and retention, respectively (maximum score 10), p < 0.001. The attitude score improved from 25 (5.25) pretest to 27 (5.25) posttest (maximum score 35), p < 0.001. The intervention also increased practice scores [25 (6)] pretest to [27 (6)] posttest, (maximum score 30) p < 0.001. Sixty-one CPs (37.6%) mentioned that patients had no time and budget to visit physicians, and 42 (25.92%) mentioned that CPs were competent to treat common infections. Total KAP scores improved significantly among different subgroups of respondents after the intervention. This was retained during follow-up. Participants perceived the intervention program to be useful. Heavy competition, the presence of many community pharmacies, and pharmacy shopping by patients were mentioned as challenges by CPs. Conclusion: A positive outcome on the KAP scores and positive feedback suggests the potential benefits of a future larger-scale educational intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.