Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207013›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2025

Assessing the Benefits of Simulation-Based Learning for Emergency Preparedness Training in the Hospital Pharmacy Dispensary.

Zhen Jia Jack Zhu, Amy Deng, Vincent H Mabasa, Dora Geng, Jordan Peralta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhen Jia Jack Zhu, BSc(Pharm), ACPR, is a Clinical Pharmacist with Surrey Memorial Hospital, Surrey, British Columbia.
Amy Deng, BPharm, MHA, CHE, is the Coordinator of Pharmacy Distribution Services with Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Burnaby Hospital, Fraser Health Authority, Burnaby, British Columbia; and a Clinical Instructor with the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Vincent H Mabasa, PharmD, is a Clinical Coordinator with Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Burnaby Hospital, Fraser Health Authority, Burnaby, British Columbia; and a Clinical Assistant Professor with the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.
Dora Geng, BSc(Pharm), ACPR, is a Clinical Pharmacist with Richmond Hospital, Richmond, British Columbia.
Jordan Peralta, RPhT, is a Pharmacy Technician with Burnaby Hospital, Burnaby, British Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based learning (SBL) has been used in various professions to fill knowledge gaps and facilitate training in essential skills. The concept of SBL in hospital pharmacy dispensaries is new, and evidence is still emerging. Preparing for operational emergencies in the hospital pharmacy dispensary setting is crucial for maintaining effective and safe provision of essential services. Objectives: The primary objective was to determine the proportion of staff who thought simulations were effective in preparing them for real-world operational emergencies in the dispensary. A key secondary objective was to report the proportion of staff who would prefer to participate in additional simulations. Methods: This study involved developing, executing (from September to December 2022), and reflecting on 3 simulations: (1) system downtime, (2) power outage, and (3) major water leak. Participants completed a paper-based survey before and after each simulation to evaluate the perceived benefit of the simulation as a tool for emergency preparedness training in the pharmacy dispensary. Results: In simulation 1, only 1 of 12 participants felt effectively prepared before the simulation, compared with 10 of 12 participants after. In simulation 2, the proportions were 1 of 10 participants before the simulation and 8 of 10 participants after. In simulation 3, the proportions were 2 of 12 participants before and all 12 participants after. Most participants across all 3 simulations expressed a preference to participate in future simulations. Conclusions: Most pharmacy staff perceived that simulations in the pharmacy dispensary were beneficial as a tool for operational emergency preparedness training and wanted to participate in future simulations.

Indexed as

benefitdispensaryhospitalsimulation

Identifiers

PMID40207013
PMCPMC11970260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.