ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
Digital Health Interventions Supporting Recovery for Intensive Care Patients and Their Family Members: A Scoping Review.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Key principles for rehabilitation of critically ill patients with obesity.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Standard of care for rehabilitation in critical illness.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Nursing Intervention to Support Psychological Recovery Among Intensive Care Patients and Their Families: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Digital Postintensive Care Support: A Comparative Survey Study Among Survivors Across Four European Countries.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Value-Based Experiences Related to Digital Follow-Up Services Among Critical Care Survivors: An International Qualitative Study.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital innovation in interventions to promote recovery for intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their family members holds promise for enhancing accessibility and improving physical, psychological, and cognitive outcomes. This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of digital health interventions designed to support the recovery of ICU patients and their family members described in peer-reviewed publications. We searched 6 databases (inception to September 2023); 2 reviewers independently screened citations against predefined eligibility criteria and extracted data. We screened 3485 records and identified 18 original studies and 8 study protocols with a range of study designs published between 2016 and 2023. Most (n=15) completed studies recruited patients only. Digital interventions were delivered through applications, virtual reality, videoconferencing, and smartwatches. In the completed studies, outcomes are described as feasibility, intervention efficacy, or both. Digital interventions supplemented with professional support and personalized feedback were more feasible than self-directed interventions. Further research is essential to ascertain the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of digital interventions in improving outcomes for ICU survivors and their family members.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.