ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
Gait Speed and Task Specificity in Predicting Lower-Limb Kinematics: A Deep Learning Approach Using Inertial Sensors.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Canine gait analysis using inertial sensors and deep learning for orthopedic and neurological disorders.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bridging the Methodological Gap Between Inertial Sensors and Optical Motion Capture: Deep Learning as the Path to Accurate Joint Kinematic Modelling Using Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a deep learning framework to predict lower-limb joint kinematics from inertial measurement unit (IMU) data across multiple gait tasks (walking, jogging, and running) and evaluate the impact of dynamic time warping (DTW) on reducing prediction errors. Patients and Methods: Data were collected from 18 participants fitted with IMUs and an optical motion capture system between May 25, 2023, and May 30, 2023. A long short-term memory autoencoder supervised regression model was developed. The model consisted of multiple long short-term memory and convolution layers. Acceleration and gyroscope data from the IMUs in 3 axes and their magnitude for the proximal and distal sensors of each joint (hip, knee, and ankle) were inputs to the model. Optical motion capture kinematics were considered ground truth and used as an output to train the prediction model. Results: The deep learning models achieved a root-mean-square error of less than 6° for hip, knee, and ankle joint sagittal plane angles, with the ankle showing the lowest error (5.1°). Task-specific models reported enhanced performance during certain gait phases, such as knee flexion during running. The application of DTW significantly reduced root-mean-square error across all tasks by at least 3° to 4°. External validation of independent data confirmed the model's generalizability. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the potential of IMU-based deep learning models for joint kinematic predictions, offering a practical solution for remote and continuous biomechanical assessments in health care and sports science.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.