Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207004›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025

Leveraging Comprehensive Echo Data to Power Artificial Intelligence Models for Handheld Cardiac Ultrasound.

D M Anisuzzaman, Jeffrey G Malins, John I Jackson, Eunjung Lee, Jwan A Naser, Behrouz Rostami, Grace Greason, Jared G Bird, Paul A Friedman, Jae K Oh and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

D M AnisuzzamanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jeffrey G MalinsDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
John I JacksonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Eunjung LeeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jwan A NaserDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Behrouz RostamiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Grace GreasonDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jared G BirdDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Paul A FriedmanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jae K OhDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Patricia A PellikkaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jeremy J ThadenDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Francisco Lopez-JimenezDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Zachi I AttiaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Sorin V PislaruDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Garvan C KaneDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a fully end-to-end deep learning framework capable of estimating left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), estimating patient age, and classifying patient sex from echocardiographic videos, including videos collected using handheld cardiac ultrasound (HCU). Patients and Methods: Deep learning models were trained using retrospective transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) data collected in Mayo Clinic Rochester and surrounding Mayo Clinic Health System sites (training: 6432 studies and internal validation: 1369 studies). Models were then evaluated using retrospective TTE data from the 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Rochester, n=1970; Arizona, n=1367; Florida, n=1562) before being applied to a prospective dataset of handheld ultrasound and TTE videos collected from 625 patients. Study data were collected between January 1, 2018 and February 29, 2024. Results: Models showed strong performance on the retrospective TTE datasets (LVEF regression: root mean squared error (RMSE)=6.83%, 6.53%, and 6.95% for Rochester, Arizona, and Florida cohorts, respectively; classification of LVEF ≤40% versus LVEF > 40%: area under curve (AUC)=0.962, 0.967, and 0.980 for Rochester, Arizona, and Florida, respectively; age: RMSE=9.44% for Rochester; sex: AUC=0.882 for Rochester), and performed comparably for prospective HCU versus TTE data (LVEF regression: RMSE=6.37% for HCU vs 5.57% for TTE; LVEF classification: AUC=0.974 vs 0.981; age: RMSE=10.35% vs 9.32%; sex: AUC=0.896 vs 0.933). Conclusion: Robust TTE datasets can be used to effectively power HCU deep learning models, which in turn demonstrates focused diagnostic images can be obtained with handheld devices.

Identifiers

PMID40207004
PMCPMC11975991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.