ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
From Paper to Pixels: Digital Transition of a Patient Decision Aid-A Pilot Study.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prioritizing Equity in Design and Implementation of Consumer-Facing Digital Resources to Support Engagement and Shared Decision-Making.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To convert a generic paper-based patient decision aid (PtDA) into digital format and assess its usability through α and β testing, recognizing the growing role of digital health technologies in empowering patients in shared decision-making. Patients and Methods: After a systematic PtDA development process in the period 2020-2022, the conversion process included scoping, prototyping, design, and testing phases. An α test evaluated internal usability, whereas 2 β tests explored the feasibility for breast and colorectal cancer patients preconsultation and postconsultation on adjuvant therapy using the preparation for decision-making scale. Results: Seven PtDA experts gave positive feedback on the quality of the digital PtDA in the α test. The 6 patients who participated in the preconsultation β test were positive about the purpose and ease of use of the digital PtDA and rated decision preparation on a scale of 0-100 with a mean score of 81.3, whereas the postconsultation β test with 10 patients reported an overall mean score of 72.0. The conversion involved several iterative design processes, showing potential for high adoption and uptake due to its convenience and accessibility before and after the consultation. Conclusion: The digital PtDA provides a user-friendly solution for patients. Overall, the conversion of a paper-based PtDA to a digital format proved successful, and the test results were promising. Further research is recommended to test the digital version on a large scale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.