ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
Optimizing Input Selection for Cardiac Model Training and Inference: An Efficient 3D Convolutional Neural Networks-Based Approach to Automate Coronary Angiogram Video Selection.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting cardiac index from coronary angiogram videos: a novel application of 3D convolutional neural networks.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Applying machine learning to predict quality ANC determinants in Bangladesh: a BDHS-2022 cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identifying determinants of malnutrition in under-five children in Bangladesh: insights from the BDHS-2022 cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an efficient and automated method for selecting appropriate coronary angiography videos for training deep learning models, thereby improving the accuracy and efficiency of medical image analysis. Patients and Methods: We developed deep learning models using 232 coronary angiographic studies from the Mayo Clinic. We utilized 2 state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNN: ResNet and X3D) to identify low-quality angiograms through binary classification (satisfactory/unsatisfactory). Ground truth for the quality of the input angiogram was determined by 2 experienced cardiologists. We validated the developed model in an independent dataset of 3208 procedures from 3 Mayo sites. Results: The 3D-CNN models outperformed their 2D counterparts, with the X3D-L model achieving superior performance across all metrics (AUC 0.98, accuracy 0.96, precision 0.87, and F1 score 0.92). Compared with 3D models, 2D architectures are smaller and less computationally complex. Despite having a 3D architecture, the X3D-L model had lower computational demand (19.34 Giga Multiply Accumulate Operation) and parameter count (5.34 M) than 2D models. When validating models on the independent dataset, slight decreases in all metrics were observed, but AUC and accuracy remained robust (0.95 and 0.92, respectively, for the X3D-L model). Conclusion: We developed a rapid and effective method for automating the selection of coronary angiogram video clips using 3D-CNNs, potentially improving model accuracy and efficiency in clinical applications. The X3D-L model reports a balanced trade-off between computational efficiency and complexity, making it suitable for real-life clinical applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.