ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
Policing the Boundary Between Responsible and Irresponsible Placing on the Market of Large Language Model Health Applications.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Six pragmatic steps to separate medical GenAI's promise from its inherent dangers.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The regulation of artificial intelligence in intensive care units: from narrow tools to generalist systems.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Innovating global regulatory frameworks for generative AI in medical devices is an urgent priority.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- If a therapy bot walks like a duck and talks like a duck then it is a medically regulated duck.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating Web Retrieval-Assisted Large Language Models With and Without Whitelisting for Evidence-Based Neurology: Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Overcoming regulatory barriers to the implementation of AI agents in healthcare.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Consternation as Congress proposal for autonomous prescribing AI coincides with the haphazard cuts at the FDA.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Cybersecurity requirements for medical devices in the EU and US - A comparison and gap analysis of the MDCG 2019-16 and FDA premarket cybersecurity guidance.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.