ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2025
Predicting Inpatient Admissions From Emergency Department Triage Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool With Artificial Intelligence (START-AI) to Predict Inpatient Admitting Specialty for Emergency Department Patients: Single Centre Deep Learning Analysis.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Simulation of covariate and concept drift in machine learning hospital admission prediction from emergency triage.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Optimising Retraining Frequency for a Paediatric Emergency Department Admission Prediction Model: Development and Temporal Validation Using Real-World Data.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- The Potential Role of Large Language Models in Assisting Patients and Guiding Emergency Care Visits.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- 30-day hospital admission among older adults initially managed at home by a mobile emergency unit: a retrospective cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing Machine Learning and Nurse Predictions for Hospital Admissions in a Multisite Emergency Care System.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the quality of evidence for using machine learning models to predict inpatient admissions from emergency department triage data, ultimately aiming to improve patient flow management. A comprehensive literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines across 5 databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL, on August 1, 2024, for English-language studies published between August 1, 2014, and August 1, 2024. This yielded 700 articles, of which 66 were screened in full, and 31 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Model quality was assessed using the PROBAST appraisal tool and a modified TRIPOD+AI framework, alongside reported model performance metrics. Seven studies demonstrated rigorous methodology and promising in silico performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic ranging from 0.81 to 0.93. However, further performance analysis was limited by heterogeneity in model development and an unclear-to-high risk of bias and applicability concerns in the remaining 24 articles, as evaluated by the PROBAST tool. The current literature demonstrates a good degree of in silico accuracy in predicting inpatient admission from triage data alone. Future research should emphasize transparent model development and reporting, temporal validation, concept drift analysis, exploration of emerging artificial intelligence techniques, and analysis of real-world patient flow metrics to comprehensively assess the usefulness of these models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.