ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound
Enhanced Diagnosis of Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia by Lung Ultrasound.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a crucial tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of acute respiratory failure, particularly in critically ill patients. In this case, a man in his late 50s presented to the emergency department with respiratory distress and rapidly deteriorated, requiring invasive ventilation and intensive care unit admission for septic shock and multiorgan dysfunction. LUS revealed extensive consolidation with linear-arborescent dynamic air bronchogram, specific for community-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia, with a global LUS score of 22, indicating significant severity. LUS demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity compared to chest radiography, allowing for a more reliable and timely diagnosis. The use of LUS was especially valuable given the patient's hemodynamic instability, which made computed tomography unfeasible. As a portable, radiation-free imaging modality, LUS offers significant advantages over traditional methods, particularly in emergency and critical care settings, where rapid bedside assessments are essential for guiding treatment and ensuring continuous patient monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.