Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206960›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP

Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on reversal learning performance during threat of shock.

Eline S Kruithof, Yvette Witteveen, Eleni Kalligeri Skentzou, Maria-Eleni Theodorakopoulou, Jana Klaus, Dennis J L G Schutter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eline S KruithofDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Yvette WitteveenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Eleni Kalligeri SkentzouDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maria-Eleni TheodorakopoulouDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jana KlausDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dennis J L G SchutterDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the cerebellar lateralization hypothesis of motivational direction, relative left-to-right dominant posterior cerebellar activity is associated with avoidance motivation and anxiety, whereas relative right-to-left dominant posterior cerebellar activity is associated with approach motivation and anger. The present study tested this hypothesis in avoidance-related behavior during rule learning combined with threat of shock. In a randomized double-blind sham-controlled between-subjects design, ninety healthy right-handed adult volunteers received either active (

Indexed as

Affective state-dependencyAnxietyCerebellumImpulsivityReversal learningThreat of shockTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40206960
PMCPMC11979461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.