ArticleCureus2025
Machine Learning Algorithms Introduce Evoked Potentials As Alternative Biomarkers for the Expanded Disability Status Scale Prognosis of Multiple Sclerosis Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Neuroimaging and Electrophysiological Markers in Multiple Sclerosis: An Integrative Review of fMRI, EEG, and EMG Approaches : fMRI, EEG, EMG in Multiple Sclerosis.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
- From inflammation to neurodegeneration: an exploratory pilot study of a diagnostic framework for progression in MS.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has witnessed a notable increase in significance within the medical field, primarily due to the increasing availability of health-related data and the progressive enhancements in ML algorithms. Thus, ML can be utilized to formulate predictive models that aid in disease diagnosis, anticipate disease progression, tailor treatment to fulfill individual patient needs, and improve the operational efficiency of healthcare systems. Timely detection of a disease contributes to effective symptom management and guarantees that appropriate treatment is provided. In multiple sclerosis (MS), evoked potentials (EPs) show a strong correlation with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), suggesting their potential as reliable predictors of disability progression. The aim of the present study is to apply artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to identify predictors linked to the progression of MS as assessed by the disability index (EDSS). It is essential to clarify the role of EPs in the prognostication of MS. We conducted an analysis of empirical data obtained from a medical database consisting of 125 records. Our primary objective is to construct an expert AI system capable of predicting the EDSS index through the application of advanced knowledge-mining algorithms. We have developed intelligent systems that predict the progression of MS utilizing ML algorithms, specifically decision trees and neural networks. In our experimental evaluation, decision trees, neural networks, and Bayes for EPs achieved accuracies of 88.9%, 92.9%, and 88.2% respectively, which are comparable to MRI that obtained accuracies of 88.2%, 96.0%, and 85.0%. The EPs can be established as predictors of MS with efficacy analogous to that of MRI findings. Further investigation is necessary to validate EPs, which are significantly less expensive, portable, and simpler to administer than MRI, as equally effective as imaging or biochemical methods in functioning as biomarkers for MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.