Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206885›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Assessment of Public Knowledge and Perceptions Toward Radiation Exposure Risks in Saudi Arabia: A Survey Study.

Abdullah A Alburayh, Mead Alosaimi, Hend Alshumiesy, Aghnar T Alzahrani, Ali S Alkhars, Delal M Doaib, Mohammed H Alsaleh, Abdullah Albakri, Noora Abdulrahman Alrajhi, Beshair Almansour and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Abdullah A AlburayhMedicine, King Faisal University, Hofuf, SAU.
Mead AlosaimiMedicine, Taif University, Taif, SAU.
Hend AlshumiesyPediatric Surgery, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Aghnar T AlzahraniMedicine and Surgery, Al Baha University, Al Bahah, SAU.
Ali S AlkharsMedicine, King Faisal University, Hofuf, SAU.
Delal M DoaibSurgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Mohammed H AlsalehDiagnostic Radiology, Al-Mouwasat Hospital, Dammam, SAU.
Abdullah AlbakriDiagnostic Radiology, King Saud Hospital, Unaizah, SAU.
Noora Abdulrahman AlrajhiCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Beshair AlmansourGeneral Practice, King Khalid Primary Healthcare Center, Unaizah, SAU.
Sumaeah AlghamdiMedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Al Baha University, Al Bahah, SAU.
Salem Hamad AldosariRadiology, Wadi Al-Dawasir General Hospital, Ministry of Health, Wadi Al-Dawasir, SAU.
Ayman S AlhasanRadiology, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Radiation exposure poses potential health risks, yet public awareness regarding its sources, effects, and safety measures remains inconsistent. Understanding the level of knowledge and perceptions about radiation risks is essential for developing effective educational strategies. This study aimed to assess public knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward radiation exposure risks in Saudi Arabia, focusing on awareness of ionizing radiation sources, safety measures, and information-seeking behaviors. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Saudi residents aged 18 years and above using an online questionnaire distributed through digital platforms. A convenience sampling method was used to recruit participants, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression models in SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The study examined associations between demographic factors and levels of knowledge and perception regarding radiation exposure risks. Results Over two-thirds (67.6%) were unaware of natural sources of ionizing radiation, and 41.5% incorrectly believed that chest X-rays and CT scans deliver equal radiation doses. The most common imaging procedures experienced were simple X-rays (28.9%) and dental X-rays (25.7%). More than half (53.1%) reported concerns during radiological tests, and 58.3% believed these procedures pose health hazards. Receiving prior information on radiation risks strongly predicted higher awareness (p < 0.001), while males and married individuals were less likely to have positive perceptions (p < 0.05). Conclusion The study identified significant gaps in public knowledge and perception toward radiation exposure risks. Receiving information on the topic was a key predictor of increased awareness, while gender and marital status influenced perceptions, with males and married participants being less likely to hold positive views. These findings emphasize the need for targeted educational interventions and tailored communication strategies to address knowledge gaps, dispel misconceptions, change attitudes, and foster patient trust regarding radiation exposure risks and radiological procedures.

Indexed as

kingdom of saudi arabia (ksa)pediatric radiation exposurepublic knowledgeradiationradiation protection measuresradiography

Identifiers

PMID40206885
PMCPMC11981237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.