Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206861›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Evidence of widespread pollen limitation in diverse specialty crops on commercial farms.

Eleanor Stroh, Ashley Leach, Zeus Mateos-Fierro, Ian Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleanor StrohDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7269-2856
Ashley LeachDepartment of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-0829
Zeus Mateos-FierroDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6970-6533
Ian KaplanDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-2750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specialty crops (non-staple fruits and vegetables) have diverse pollination requirements and pollinator communities, yet production may be limited by pollen limitation. We quantified insect pollination and pollen limitation on commercial farms across crops that differ in their reliance on insect pollination, including watermelons, apples, blueberries and tomatoes. We also considered the impact of thinning in apples and protected culture of tomatoes on pollination dynamics. We compared fruit set and quality across insect exclusion, open pollination and hand pollination treatments. Insect pollination increased fruit set in every crop (increase from exclusion to open treatments; mean = 22.9%, range = 1.1-48.0%), while hand pollination increased fruit set across crops, except for apples after thinning (increase from open to hand pollination treatments; mean = 5.8%, range = 0.3-8.7%). The effect of pollination treatment on fruit quality varied. Field tomatoes were the only crop to demonstrate pollen limitation in all metrics. Despite evidence for ambient pollinator contributions across specialty crops, our work highlights the opportunity for further increases in yield, particularly in crops not considered dependent on pollinators like tomatoes.

Indexed as

appleblueberrycrop yieldpollination servicestomatowatermelon

Identifiers

PMID40206861
PMCPMC11978442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.