Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206852›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Hiding in plain sight: the biomolecular identification of pinniped use in medieval manuscripts.

Élodie Lévêque, Matthew D Teasdale, Sarah Fiddyment, Maiken Hemme Bro-Jørgensen, Luke Spindler, Ruairidh Macleod, François Bougard, Morten Tange Olsen, Matthew Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Élodie LévêqueHiCSA, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8420-792X
Matthew D TeasdaleMcDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sarah FiddymentMcDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8991-2318
Maiken Hemme Bro-JørgensenEvolutionary Genomics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Luke SpindlerBioArCh, Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK.
Ruairidh MacleodEvolutionary Genomics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8086-4420
François BougardInstitut de Recherche et d'Histoire des Textes, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Morten Tange Olsen *Evolutionary Genomics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Matthew Collins *Evolutionary Genomics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4226-5501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The survival of medieval manuscripts in their original bindings remains a rare occurrence. Taking advantage of the diversity of bindings in Cistercian libraries such as Clairvaux and its daughter abbeys during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, this study focuses on the biocodicological analysis of medieval manuscript bindings, with particular emphasis on the use of sealskins. Using innovative methods such as electrostatic zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry (eZooMS) and ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis, this research identifies the animal species and origin of the leather used in these bindings as predominantly pinniped (seal) species. In particular, the collagen-based eZooMS technique facilitated the classification of seven chemises into the pinniped clade, although species identification remained elusive, except in one additional case where a bearded seal (

Indexed as

biocodicologymedieval manuscriptsNorse trade networkspinnipedRomanesque bindingssealskin

Identifiers

PMID40206852
PMCPMC11978456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.