ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Association between individual, household, and area-level socioeconomic status indicators with anthropometric indexes.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Overweight and obesity are major determinants that contribute to the occurrence of non-communicable diseases. We aim to examine the association between anthropometric indexes and socioeconomic status. Study design: This study was a population-based cross-sectional study conducted on 9846 adults aged 35 to 70 years who participated in the Hoveyzeh Cohort Study from May 2016 to August 2018 in southwestern Iran. Methods: We assessed the relationship between three levels of socioeconomic indicators with eight anthropometric indexes. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust the potential confounders. Results: The mean ± sd age of 9846 participants was 48.80 ± 9.20, and 5820 (59.1 %) were female Among the socioeconomic indicators, after control for potential confounders, the wealth index and, in the second place, the townsend deprivation index had the strongest relationships with anthropometric indexes. In contrast, the relationships between education and anthropometric indexes were mostly weak and without certain trends. Among the anthropometric indexes, waist circumference, abdominal volume index, and waist to height ratio had a statistically significant association with socioeconomic indicators. The weakest associations were found for the waist to hip ratio index. Conclusion: This study showed significant associations between socioeconomic and anthropometric indicators. The role of economic factors is more decisive than social factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.