ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Development of a repetitive traumatic brain injury risk function based on real-world accident reconstruction and wavelet packet energy analysis.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing evaluation criteria for pedestrian head impact injuries focus only on single impacts, with less attention given to repetitive traumatic brain injury (rTBI), which is common in motor vehicle collisions, falls, and sports. Improving pedestrian collision protection safety requires a complete understanding of the tolerance of the repeated collisions of the human brain to injury. Therefore, this study aimed to collect data from 72 pedestrian collisions that were reconstructed using MADYMO and THUMS finite element head models (version 4.0.2). The evaluation metrics for rTBI were developed by integrating brain injury criteria based on time-domain features, including the head injury criterion (HIC), brain injury criterion (BrIC), diffuse axonal multi-axial general evaluation (DAMAGE), and maximum principal strain (MPS), with frequency-domain features obtained from wavelet packet transform energy analysis of head motion responses. The proposed brain tolerance for mild and severe rTBI was estimated through parametric survival analysis and presented as injury risk curves based on the selected injury metrics. The results showed a significant difference in brain injury tolerance between repetitive and single collisions. For the 50% probability of mild and severe brain injury in real accidents, the thresholds for rTBI metrics based on BrIC and DAMAGE were 1.085 and 1.513 and 0.494 and 0.678, respectively, all higher than the thresholds of single-impact reported in previous studies. However, the thresholds for repetitive head injury criteria based on MPS were 0.604 and 0.838, which were lower than the thresholds of single impact reported in previous studies, implying that the prediction of tolerance to repetitive brain more consistent with tissue-level than head kinematics level. This study developed injury risk functions (IRFs) for rTBI by integrating the amplitude-frequency characteristics of head responses and brain injury criteria. This knowledge further provides crucial support for understanding the tolerance to rTBI and enhancing pedestrian safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.