ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Non-coding RNA in cartilage regeneration: regulatory mechanism and therapeutic strategies.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circular RNAs orchestrate molecular networks in osteoarthritis: From miRNA sponging to epigenetic and exosome-mediated regulation.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- A sulfate-arsenical-ferruginous water affects apoptosis, oxidative stress and the gene expression of inflammatory mediators and of a panel of MicroRNA in IL-1β stimulated human osteoarthritic chondrocytes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pathogenesis of cartilage injury and degeneration is exceptionally complex. In addition to being associated with osteoarthritis and trauma, factors such as age, gender, obesity, inflammation, and apoptosis of chondrocytes are also considered significant influencing factors. Due to the lack of direct blood supply, lymphatic circulation, and neural innervation, coupled with low metabolic activity, the self-repair capability of cartilage after injury is extremely limited, making its treatment quite challenging. Recent research indicated that ncRNA, a class of RNA transcribed from the genome that does not encode proteins, played a crucial regulatory role in various disease processes. Particularly noteworthy is its positive regulatory role in cartilage regeneration, achieved through the modulation of the inflammatory microenvironment, promotion of chondrocyte proliferation, inhibition of chondrocyte degradation, and facilitation of the recruitment and differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into chondrocytes. In the earlier phase, we conducted a review and outlook on therapeutic strategies for the regeneration of articular cartilage injuries. This article specifically focuses on summarizing the regulatory roles and research advancements of ncRNA in cartilage regeneration, as well as its contributions to the clinical application of gene therapy for cartilage defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.