ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
Frequency of abnormal results in screening laboratory tests and associated interventions in emergency psychiatric services.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Frequency of abnormal results in screening laboratory tests and associated interventions in emergency psychiatric services.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Screening laboratory tests for patients with acute psychiatric symptoms are discouraged in general emergency services but are recommended by emergency psychiatric guidelines due to the high prevalence of abnormal findings in severe psychiatric patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the utility of screening laboratory tests in a real-world, emergency psychiatric setting through focusing on how often abnormal values lead to medical interventions. Methods: The electronic medical records were reviewed for adult patients who were involuntarily admitted to Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital for an imminent risk of self-harm or harm to others between October 2019 and September 2022. The number of patients, abnormal screening laboratory findings, and medical interventions were examined. Results: Of the 600 patients identified in the review, 595 had abnormal laboratory findings, but only 97 (16.3%) underwent medical interventions related to these results. Frequently observed abnormal findings, such as elevated creatine kinase and an elevated white blood cell count, were often attributed to the patient's agitation or were considered clinically nonsignificant. Notably, one-third of the interventions prompted by laboratory findings resulted only in additional testing. More than half of the treatments were either of questionable necessity or nonurgent. Medical interventions other than additional tests were more likely to be prompted by the patient's medical history and presentation. Conclusion: In the emergency psychiatric setting, abnormal laboratory findings are common, but clinical decisions largely rely on the patient's medical history and presentation, with few requiring immediate interventions. A history-driven approach may enhance the clinical value of laboratory tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.