ReviewSurgical neurology international2025
Cerebral arteriovenous malformation calcifications: A systematic review, case series, and a proposed classification system.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are intracranial vascular lesions characterized by a nidus of vessels fed by an artery and drained by a vein, lacking intervening capillaries. Angiography remains the gold standard for a definitive diagnosis. There is a paucity in the literature regarding clinical presentation and management of patients with calcified cerebral AVM (cCAVM). This study aims to highlight the clinical presentation and management of patients with cCAVM and also to propose a classification of calcification patterns in cCAVMs based on brain computed tomography (CT) findings. Methods: A systematic review using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was done according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify cases that illustrate cCAVM. A case series was also presented to supplement the current literature. Results: Twenty patients with cCAVM were included, with the male gender representing more than 50% of the patient population. Their age ranged from 11 to 69 years, with seizures being the most common presenting symptom. The frontal lobe was the most common location of AVMs, followed by the parietal lobe. Most (80%) of the calcifications were nidal, with the remaining being extranidal (20%). Conclusion: The CT scans of patients displayed significant variability due to the unique characteristics of each cCAVM. To address this diversity, a novel classification system was developed to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding cCAVMs based on their location, size, and extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.