ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Timing of cerebrospinal fluid diversion with ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in cranioplasty reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A substantial proportion of patients who undergo decompressive craniectomy develop hydrocephalus (HCP), necessitating both cranioplasty (CP) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting procedures. There is wide variation in the timing and sequence of these operations. We aim to define the complication rates and types of each treatment algorithm in patients requiring both CP and CSF shunting in an effort to identify the optimal sequence of procedures. Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed to assess complication rates for preCP shunting, simultaneous CP-shunting, and post-CP shunting. Results: There is a significant difference in complication rates between shunt placement before CP (35% demonstrated complications, confidence interval (CI) 95%, 30.9-39.1, simultaneous ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and CP (30.8%, CI 95%, 28.4-33.3), and shunt post-CP (24.4%, CI 95%, 20.5-28.2), with the shunt post-CP cohort demonstrating the lowest percentage of all complication subtypes. There is a trend toward decreased odds of complication when CP is performed before VPS. Conclusion: This information should further strengthen existing recommendations that, whenever possible, CP is performed before VPS to potentially allow for CSF dynamics to normalize. The study population does demonstrate heterogeneity. Therefore, considerations should be made based on the clinical picture and a patient's course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.