ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Deep learning for steganalysis: evaluating model robustness against image transformations.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stacked multi-fusion CNN: an adaptive attention model for privacy preserving deepfake forensics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An end-to-end convolutional neural network for secure image transmission via joint encryption and steganography.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the robustness of deep learning-based steganalysis models against common image transformations because most literature has not paid enough attention to resilience assessment. Current and future applications of steganalysis to guarantee digital security are gaining importance regarding real-world modifications: resizing, compression, cropping, and adding noise. These included the following five basic models: EfficientNet, SRNet, ResNet, Xu-Net, and Yedroudj-Net. We evaluated these models' pre- and post-transformation performances based on various metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC with the BOSSBase dataset. Our results showed that EfficientNet is the most robust among the considered architecture transformations. Still, it also underlined significant degradations for state-of-the-art models, Xu-Net and Yedroudj-Net, especially with added noise. These results indicate the need to develop more robust architectures capable of sustaining real-world image alterations. In practice, it will assist practitioners in choosing models that best suit operational environments and lay the necessary platform for future enhancements in the design of such models. In this regard, in the future, more transformations should be researched with ensemble and adaptive approaches to improve robustness further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.