ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis of Long QT Syndrome: A Review of Current State, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning-based models in prediction of the radiological outcomes of vestibular schwannoma following stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Sports Cardiology: Advancing Cardiovascular Screening and Diagnosis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence and ECG: A New Frontier in Cardiac Diagnostics and Prevention.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Congenital Long QT Syndrome: A Focus on Risk Stratification and Management.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence for Brugada syndrome diagnosis and gene variants interpretation.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Sports Medicine: Reshaping Electrocardiogram Analysis for Athlete Safety-A Narrative Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Exercise Testing and Artificial Intelligence as Allies in Improving the Detection and Diagnosis of Long QT Syndrome.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
- Reply to: Exercise Testing and Artificial Intelligence as Allies in Improving the Detection and Diagnosis of Long QT Syndrome.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a potentially life-threatening cardiac repolarization disorder characterized by an increased risk of fatal arrhythmias. Accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for risk stratification and appropriate management. However, traditional diagnostic approaches have limitations, necessitating more objective and efficient tools. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising solutions by enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of electrocardiography (ECG) interpretation. The AI algorithms can process ECG data more rapidly than human experts, providing real-time analysis and prompt identification of individuals at risk, and reducing interobserver variability. By analyzing large volumes of ECG data, AI algorithms can extract meaningful features that may not be apparent to the human eye. Advancements in AI-driven corrected QT interval monitoring using mobile ECG devices, such as smartwatches, offer a valuable and convenient tool for identifying individuals at risk of LQTS-related complications, which is particularly applicable during pandemic conditions, such as COVID-19. Integration of AI into clinical practice poses a number of challenges. Bias in data gathering and patient privacy concerns are important considerations that must be addressed. Safeguarding patient privacy and ensuring data protection are crucial for maintaining trust in AI-driven systems. In addition, the interpretability of AI algorithms is a concern because understanding the decision-making process is essential for clinicians to trust and confidently use these tools. Future perspectives in this field may involve the integration of AI into diagnostic protocols, through genetic subtype classifications on the basis of ECG data. Moreover, explainable AI techniques aim to uncover ECG features associated with LQTS diagnosis, suggesting new insights into LQTS pathophysiology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.