Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206660›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in freshwater science2024

Expert insights on managing harmful algal blooms.

Sarah Goodrich, Katherine Nicole Canfield, Kate Mulvaney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in freshwater science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah GoodrichDepartment of Geography and GIS, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Katherine Nicole CanfieldU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Office of Science Advisor, Policy, and Engagement, Washington, DC, United States.
Kate MulvaneyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, Narragansett, RI, United States.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater harmful algal blooms (HABs) are a global environmental, economic, social, and public health hazard. While there is an increasing understanding of the ecological considerations of HABs, there is limited understanding of human dimensions and management needs. We conducted semi-structured key informant interviews with 28 water managers and researchers to better understand how they perceive current management and to identify future management priorities in regard to HABs. For this study, we interviewed 31 key informants from three regions of the United States (New England, Ohio, and the Mountain West). We solicited insights across aspects of HABs management, including prevention, forecasting, monitoring, response, and communication. Nutrient management was the main consideration for the prevention of HAB events. Key informants noted that forecasting has the potential to be a valuable tool in the future but is not yet accurate enough at a local scale for widespread use. Monitoring was found to be implemented in varying ways across and even within the states and regions, with a need for more funding and standardization. HAB event responses vary greatly from chemical and physical treatments that suppress toxins to no-swim advisories, all with a mix of strengths and weaknesses. Finally, an increase in and improvement of communication efforts was identified as critical for reducing public health risks. These findings provide perceptions of current management practices and future plans while including opportunities to improve current freshwater HAB management efforts.

Indexed as

decision makersharmful algal bloomsinterviewsmonitoringnutrientswater management

Identifiers

PMID40206660
PMCPMC11976657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.