Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206641›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2025

Differential Sources of Distress in Clinical and Research Trainees: A Focus on Work and Role Relationships.

Laurence M Boitet, David A Rogers, Katherine L Sweeney, Mark C Schall, C Allen Gorman, Bobby Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurence M BoitetDepartment of Medical Education, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
David A RogersUAB Medicine Office of Wellness, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Katherine L SweeneyDepartment of Sociology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Mark C SchallDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
C Allen GormanDepartment of Management, Information Systems, and Quantitative Methods, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Bobby JonesDepartment of Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine the experience of clinical and research trainees within an academic medical center setting to identify and compare factors influencing their wellbeing. Participants and Methods: A cross-sectional, anonymous survey was conducted from June to July 2022 at a large academic medical center. Responses from clinical and research trainees were analyzed for this study. The survey assessed participant wellbeing using the Well-Being Index (WBI), in addition to perceptions of individual and organizational factors. Data were analyzed to identify correlates of elevated WBI scores and differences in clinical and research experience. Results: Ordinal logistic regression analysis identified low sense of recognition (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44-0.79), low role clarity (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.42-0.80), moral distress (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.24-2.10), and social isolation or loneliness (OR, 2.79; 95% CI 1.69-4.61) as significantly associated with high WBI scores, accounting for 48.8% of predicted variance. Additionally, distressed clinical trainees (WBI≥2) reported lower control over their work ( Conclusion: Our study indicates that trainees experience high levels of distress, although the sources differ. To effectively address these challenges, organizations should implement interventions targeted to address specific stressors of each group.

Identifiers

PMID40206641
PMCPMC11979368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.