Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206629›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2023

Existing Meditation and Breathing Devices for Stress Reduction and Their Incorporated Stimuli: A Systematic Literature Review and Competition Analysis.

Elisabeth Honinx, Stefanie Broes, Bente Roekaerts, Isabelle Huys, Rosanne Janssens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Human Health Engineering: Going From Biology to Technology.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabeth HoninxMoonbird B.V., Brussels, Belgium.
Stefanie BroesMoonbird B.V., Brussels, Belgium.
Bente RoekaertsMoonbird B.V., Brussels, Belgium.
Isabelle HuysMoonbird B.V., Brussels, Belgium.
Rosanne JanssensMoonbird B.V., Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify, evaluate, and summarize existing meditation and breathing devices for stress reduction and their characteristics (stimuli), we searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies published from January 1, 1980, to December 30, 2021. Full-text articles that presented devices that support meditation and breathing guidance for stress reduction were included. We excluded articles covering study protocols. In addition, a competitor analysis was conducted to identify and evaluate the devices, their name, manufacturer, target group, function, and incorporated stimuli were contracted. The scientific literature identified 367 studies, of which 20 (describing 18 devices and 32 stimuli) were included. The competition analysis identified 66 devices incorporating 126 stimuli. After exclusion of duplicates, this resulted in 46 different types of devices incorporating 24 different types of stimuli. They were organized into 7 device categories (attachable to the head, huggable devices, handheld devices, eye masks, mouth-controlled devices, toys, and wearables) and 14 stimuli categories (perceptible vibrations, imperceptible vibrations, movement, temperature, pressure, texture, light or darkness, abstract visuals, concrete visuals, music, calming sounds, tones, voice guidance, and aromas). This review provides an overview of the different meditation and breathing devices for stress reduction. The current overview will inform a subsequent preference and effectiveness study of breathing devices that aims to gain more knowledge on the topic to increase device uptake and developmental success.

Identifiers

PMID40206629
PMCPMC11975735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.