ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2023
Existing Meditation and Breathing Devices for Stress Reduction and Their Incorporated Stimuli: A Systematic Literature Review and Competition Analysis.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of a Technology-Assisted, Two-Month Breathing Exercise Intervention on Daily Affect, Weekly Stress and Examinational Stress.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Human Health Engineering: Going From Biology to Technology.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023Article
- The effectiveness and user preferences of two tactile breathing devices in reducing stress in stressed individuals: A mixed methods study.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify, evaluate, and summarize existing meditation and breathing devices for stress reduction and their characteristics (stimuli), we searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies published from January 1, 1980, to December 30, 2021. Full-text articles that presented devices that support meditation and breathing guidance for stress reduction were included. We excluded articles covering study protocols. In addition, a competitor analysis was conducted to identify and evaluate the devices, their name, manufacturer, target group, function, and incorporated stimuli were contracted. The scientific literature identified 367 studies, of which 20 (describing 18 devices and 32 stimuli) were included. The competition analysis identified 66 devices incorporating 126 stimuli. After exclusion of duplicates, this resulted in 46 different types of devices incorporating 24 different types of stimuli. They were organized into 7 device categories (attachable to the head, huggable devices, handheld devices, eye masks, mouth-controlled devices, toys, and wearables) and 14 stimuli categories (perceptible vibrations, imperceptible vibrations, movement, temperature, pressure, texture, light or darkness, abstract visuals, concrete visuals, music, calming sounds, tones, voice guidance, and aromas). This review provides an overview of the different meditation and breathing devices for stress reduction. The current overview will inform a subsequent preference and effectiveness study of breathing devices that aims to gain more knowledge on the topic to increase device uptake and developmental success.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.