Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206587›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

A feasibility study of deep learning prediction model for VMAT patient-specific QA.

Junjie Miao, Yuan Xu, Kuo Men, Jianrong Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junjie Miao *Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuan Xu *Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Kuo MenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianrong DaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study introduces a deep learning (DL) model that leverages doses calculated from both a treatment planning system (TPS) and independent dose verification software using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, aiming to predict the gamma passing rate (GPR) in VMAT patient-specific QA more accurately. Materials and method: We utilized data from 710 clinical VMAT plans measured with an ArcCHECK phantom. These plans were recalculated on an ArcCHECK phantom image using Pinnacle TPS and MC algorithms, and the planar dose distributions corresponding to the detector element surfaces were utilized as input for the DL model. A convolutional neural network (CNN) comprising four layers was employed for model training. The model's performance was evaluated through multiple predictive error metrics and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for various gamma criteria. Results: The mean absolute errors (MAE) between measured GPR and predicted GPR are 1.1%, 1.9%, 1.7%, and 2.6% for the 3%/3mm, 3%/2mm, 2%/3mm, and 2%/2mm gamma criteria, respectively. The correlation coefficients between predicted GPR and measured GPR are 0.69, 0.72, 0.68, and 0.71 for each gamma criterion. The AUC (Area Under the Curve) values based on ROC curve for the four gamma criteria are 0.90, 0.92, 0.93, and 0.89, indicating high classification performance. Conclusion: This DL-based approach showcases significant potential in enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of VMAT patient-specific QA. This approach promises to be a useful tool for reducing the workload of patient-specific quality assurance.

Indexed as

ArcCHECKdeep learninggamma passing rateMonte Carloquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID40206587
PMCPMC11979141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.