Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206578›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025

Faculty Tenure in US Academic Medical Institutions: A Critical Review of Controversy and Debate.

Anish Bhardwaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anish BhardwajDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over a century, tenure has been a foundational tenet in American academic institutions, being synonymous with the concept of academic freedom. This concept has been extrapolated to US Academic Medical Institutions (AMIs) in multiple domains including teaching and research, sharing opinions as private citizens and on matters of institutional governance as well as providing clinicians, educators, scientists, and scholars opportunities for secure employment. In recent decades, however, there has been a steady erosion of the tenure system in US AMIs, and constituents suggest that this archaic construct would benefit from reform or even its complete abolition. The present treatise offers a historical perspective on the tenure system in AMIs, reviews the enthusiastic debate and controversies including the concomitant advantages, disadvantages, challenges, and the underlying reasons for its decline over the last few decades, and expounds on the ramifications of such trends. This exposition also discusses alternatives and reform to the tenure system which, if implemented, would still guarantee freedom in academic medicine.

Indexed as

academic freedomacademic medical institutionsfaculty rightstenure reform

Identifiers

PMID40206578
PMCPMC11980933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.