ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
[Critical factors for institutionalizing evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organizationsFactores críticos para la institucionalización de la toma de decisiones basada en la evidencia en las organizaciones de salud].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Critical factors for institutionalizing evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organizationsFactores críticos para la institucionalización de la toma de decisiones basada en la evidencia en las organizaciones de salud].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To map critical factors for sustainable processes in the institutionalization of evidence-informed decision-making in public health organizations. Method: A rapid critical interpretative synthesis was carried out based on searches conducted in databases, websites, and reference lists, with findings categorized into an appropriate framework. Results: Twenty studies were analyzed and six dimensions of critical factors were addressed: 1) governance, aimed at dealing with difficulties in the organizational context and motivation for change, together with a management style that has a long-term vision and invests in communication tools; 2) standardized routine processes, involving the characteristics of information that facilitate its incorporation into organizational practices; 3) leadership and commitment, revealing the importance of identifying and engaging leaders who can influence the adoption of evidence-informed policies in organizations; 4) resources, which correspond to the need for training programs that ensure the availability of a team with the skills needed to identify research evidence within a supportive organizational infrastructure; 5) partnerships, collective action, and support, which show the importance of involving stakeholders in collaborative processes, using exchange structures; and 6) culture, related to efforts to bring research and policy closer together, so that they are more receptive to organizational changes. Conclusion: The identified critical factors can provide a reference framework to support improvement planning and the institutionalization of evidence use. The results are applicable to organizations that formulate and implement public health policies and other social policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.