ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Human preferences for cognitive and emotional capabilities in robots across different application domains.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People's preferences regarding cognitive and emotional capabilities in robots need to be considered in the design of robotic systems that align with human values and expectations. This study investigates how such preferences vary across different robotics application domains and identifies key influencing factors. In a between-subjects study with 271 participants, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected on preferences for 12 mental (cognitive and emotional) capabilities in six types of robots, each situated in a specific domain: healthcare, defense, household, social, education, or customer service. The results reveal a general preference for agency-related abilities (e.g., planning, reasoning) over experience-related abilities (e.g., feeling happiness, pain) across all domains. However, there was a weaker preference for agency capability in household cleaning robots and a stronger preference for experience capability in social companionship robots. Qualitative analysis revealed a common desire for robots to function objectively and logically, without emotions, while still showing empathy toward human mental states. Additionally, gender and educational background emerged as factors influencing participants' preferences. Unlike previous research, which mainly focused on the attribution of mental capabilities to robots, this study offers insights into human preferences and the factors shaping them, which can inform the design of future robots and help facilitate their successful integration into society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.