ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
Real-World Assessment of the Efficacy of Computer-Assisted Diagnosis in Colonoscopy: A Single Institution Cohort Study in Singapore.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- InfoColon: A dataset for consecutive informative frames in Colonoscopy.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of real-time characterization in artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the efficacy and accuracy of the GI Genius Intelligent Endoscopy Module Computer-Assisted Diagnosis (CADx) program in colonic adenoma detection and real-time polyp characterization. Patients and Methods: Colonoscopy remains the gold standard in colonic screening and evaluation. The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) technology therefore allows for optimized endoscopic performance. However, validation of most CADx programs with real-world data remains scarce. This prospective cohort study was conducted within a single Singaporean institution between April 1, 2023 and December 31, 2023. Videos of all AI-enabled colonoscopies were reviewed with polyp-by-polyp analysis performed. Real-time polyp characterization predictions after sustained polyp detection were compared against final histology results to assess the accuracy of the CADx system at colonic adenoma identification. Results: A total of 808 videos of CADx colonoscopies were reviewed. Out of the 781 polypectomies performed, 543 (69.5%) and 222 (28.4%) were adenomas and non-adenomas on final histology, respectively. Overall, GI Genius correctly characterized adenomas with 89.4% sensitivity, 61.7% specificity, a positive predictive value of 85.4%, a negative predictive value of 69.8%, and 81.5% accuracy. The negative predictive value for rectosigmoid lesions (80.3%) was notably higher than for colonic lesions (54.2%), attributed to the increased prevalence of hyperplastic rectosigmoid polyps (11.4%) vs other colonic regions (5.4%). Conclusion: Computer-Assisted Diagnosis is therefore a promising adjunct in colonoscopy with substantial clinical implications. Accurate identification of low-risk non-adenomatous polyps encourages the adoption of "resect-and-discard" strategies. However, further calibration of AI systems is needed before the acceptance of such strategies as the new standard of care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.