ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
A Blueprint for Clinical-Driven Medical Device Development: The Feverkidstool Application to Identify Children With Serious Bacterial Infection.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical decision rules (CDRs) integrated into applications enhance diagnostic and treatment prediction support for clinicians, necessitating Confirmité Europeenne (CE)-mark certification to enter the European market. We describe the development of a CDR as a medical device, focusing on challenges from a physician's perspective exemplified by the Feverkidstool (FKT), a validated CDR for febrile children. We pursued a local process, aligned with the CE-marking process, to develop the FKT as in-house developed device. We aimed to provide a blueprint for colleagues. Medical device development, conforming the medical device regulation and performed by a multidisciplinary team, encompassed 5 stages: market scan, design, production, verification and validation and conformity assessment. Regulatory processes were continuously updated. The market scan identified a need for the FKT compared with existing applications. A prototype was designed in stage 2, further adjusted and improved based on the qualitative and quantitative results of stages 2-4. Lastly, stage 5 confirmed FKT's performance and safety. Medical device development presents challenges for physicians, requiring collaboration for technical, regulatory, and financial expertise. Multidisciplinary teamwork also poses challenges, including uncertainties regarding responsibility and timelines. After CE certification, adapting to evolving needs and ensuring data privacy highlights the ongoing nature of medical device development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.