ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
Implementation of a Tiered Cardiac Telemetry System: An Operational Blueprint at Mayo Clinic.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the operational outcomes and implementation effects of tiered cardiac telemetry monitoring in a hospital environment using an innovative technology. Patients and Methods: The research focuses on assessing the precision, speed, and reliability of alerts generated by a wireless device in adult patients aged 18 and above, concurrently monitored by a hardwired, continuous cardiac monitor. Using an agile methodology, we tested and validated a nonhardwired, cellular-connected continuous cardiac monitor (InfoBionic MoMe) in 162 patients. A comparison was made between the wireless device and the standard hardwired system, conducted at Mayo Clinic Hospital with Institutional Review Board approval from June 6, 2022, to December 15, 2022. Results: The study revealed a high correlation of events captured compared with the standard care model. Differences in algorithms, alarm parameters, and operational considerations impacting clinical implementation were observed. Connectivity improvements during the study reduced latency from 3-5 minutes to 30 seconds. Delayed alarms were attributed to device damage (4.5% of cases) and poor cellular connections (29% within 31-60 seconds). Conclusion: The implementation of tiered cardiac telemetry in hospital environments, coupled with advancements in remote cardiac monitoring, supports expanded bedside telemetry capabilities and near real-time remote monitoring postdischarge. Although the study successfully validated the wireless device concept, improvements are needed before implementation for inpatient cardiac monitoring. Further research and technological enhancements can build on these findings to enhance health care practices in this domain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.