ReviewCureus2025
Stuck Together: A Systematic Review of Hand Syndactyly.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dorsal Island Flap for Syndactyly Reconstruction: A Skin-Sparing Technique Associated With Reduced Web Creep.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Challenges Associated With First Web Space Congenital Syndactyly Reconstruction of the Hand.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- The use of Hyaluronic Acid Matrix for Effective Skin Deficit Coverage in Pediatric Complex Syndactyly Reconstruction: A Case Report and Technique Review.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- ASO Author Reflections: First Reported Case of Successful Submucosal Tunneling and Endoscopic Resection of an Esophageal Leiomyoma in a Child.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- The superficial transverse metacarpal ligament and the interdigital web. A proof-of-concept study based on palpation, ultrasonography, casts, and dissection.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand syndactyly is a congenital malformation resulting from the failure of differentiation between two or more digits, resulting in a subsequent fusion. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze the genetic and embryological mechanisms underlying both syndromic and non-syndromic variants of hand syndactyly, as well as evaluate the effectiveness of surgical interventions utilized in the correction of this congenital anomaly to improve patient outcomes and reduce complications. The review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases without time restrictions up to August 2024. Studies included in this review examined (1) genetic and embryological mechanisms of syndactyly; (2) classification systems; and (3) surgical treatment outcomes. Reference lists of identified articles were manually screened for additional studies. Exclusion criteria included (1) conference papers, letters to the editor, reviews, and video articles; (2) studies on congenital hand malformations other than syndactyly; (3) studies involving animal subjects; (4) studies with updated reviews from the same authors; (5) preliminary studies; and (6) studies with duplicate information. Out of 3015 initial records and 212 additional sources, 88 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing insights into the genetics, embryology, and surgical management of hand syndactyly. Risk of bias was assessed using the traffic light plot within the Robvis risk-of-bias framework. While many studies demonstrated methodological rigor based on the key domains assessed, limitations included recall bias in retrospective cohort studies, inconsistent stratification of surgical outcomes, and inadequate control for confounding factors. The findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and intervention, particularly surgical correction between 18 and 24 months, to improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. Various surgical techniques have been explored, each with distinct benefits depending on the type and extent of malformation. Patient-reported outcomes show higher satisfaction with upper extremity function and reduced pain interference, highlighting the value of personalized treatment approaches. Despite expanded classification systems and improved surgical techniques, the multifactorial etiology of hand syndactyly requires further investigation to refine diagnostic strategies and enhance treatment protocols, ultimately improving patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.