Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206497›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Stuck Together: A Systematic Review of Hand Syndactyly.

Shelleen Gowrie, Opeyemi Omosebi, Philip Veith, Neil Agarwal, Sameer Shah, Michael Montalbano, R Shane Tubbs, Marios Loukas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shelleen GowrieAnatomical Sciences, St. George's University, School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.
Opeyemi OmosebiMedicine, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, USA.
Philip VeithInternal Medicine, Northwell Health, Syosset Hospital, Syosset, USA.
Neil AgarwalInternal Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Midtown Campus, Baltimore, USA.
Sameer ShahAnatomy, St. George's University, School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.
Michael MontalbanoAnatomy, St. George's University, School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.
R Shane TubbsAnatomical Sciences, St. George's University, School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.
Marios LoukasAnatomical Sciences, St. George's University, School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hand syndactyly is a congenital malformation resulting from the failure of differentiation between two or more digits, resulting in a subsequent fusion. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze the genetic and embryological mechanisms underlying both syndromic and non-syndromic variants of hand syndactyly, as well as evaluate the effectiveness of surgical interventions utilized in the correction of this congenital anomaly to improve patient outcomes and reduce complications. The review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases without time restrictions up to August 2024. Studies included in this review examined (1) genetic and embryological mechanisms of syndactyly; (2) classification systems; and (3) surgical treatment outcomes. Reference lists of identified articles were manually screened for additional studies. Exclusion criteria included (1) conference papers, letters to the editor, reviews, and video articles; (2) studies on congenital hand malformations other than syndactyly; (3) studies involving animal subjects; (4) studies with updated reviews from the same authors; (5) preliminary studies; and (6) studies with duplicate information. Out of 3015 initial records and 212 additional sources, 88 studies met the inclusion criteria, providing insights into the genetics, embryology, and surgical management of hand syndactyly. Risk of bias was assessed using the traffic light plot within the Robvis risk-of-bias framework. While many studies demonstrated methodological rigor based on the key domains assessed, limitations included recall bias in retrospective cohort studies, inconsistent stratification of surgical outcomes, and inadequate control for confounding factors. The findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and intervention, particularly surgical correction between 18 and 24 months, to improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. Various surgical techniques have been explored, each with distinct benefits depending on the type and extent of malformation. Patient-reported outcomes show higher satisfaction with upper extremity function and reduced pain interference, highlighting the value of personalized treatment approaches. Despite expanded classification systems and improved surgical techniques, the multifactorial etiology of hand syndactyly requires further investigation to refine diagnostic strategies and enhance treatment protocols, ultimately improving patient care.

Indexed as

genetic syndromemusculoskeletal diseasesplastic surgery proceduressyndactylyupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID40206497
PMCPMC11980011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.