Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206495›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Exploratory Investigation of Barriers to Writing Case Reports Among Japanese Physicians Who Participated in Web Study Sessions.

Tsuneaki Kenzaka, Shinsuke Yahata, Naoya Mizutani, Ayako Kumabe, Ryo Fujiwara, Koki Kosami, Hiroyuki Mori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tsuneaki KenzakaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Tamba Medical Center, Tamba, JPN.
Shinsuke YahataDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Harima-Himeji General Medical Center, Himeji, JPN.
Naoya MizutaniDivision of Community Medicine and Career Development, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, JPN.
Ayako KumabeDivision of Community Medicine and Career Development, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, JPN.
Ryo FujiwaraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Tamba Medical Center, Tamba, JPN.
Koki KosamiDivision of Public Health, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, JPN.
Hiroyuki MoriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Tamba Medical Center, Tamba, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examined the barriers to writing case reports among Japanese physicians who participated in a web study series titled "Let's Write a Case Report! What you need to do to be Accepted" and explored differences in these barriers based on physicians' years of experience.

methodsThe study design was cross-sectional in nature. Throughout August and November 2020, the respondents participated in the web study sessions. Using an 11-point scale, from -5 (not a barrier at all) to 0 (neither) to 5 (very much of a barrier), the 16 items interrogated which elements could be barriers to case report writing. Participants were divided into two groups: those with 10 or fewer years of postgraduation experience and those with 11 or more years of postgraduation experience. The basic attributes and possible barriers were compared between the groups using chi-squared and t-tests.

resultsIn total, 53 (62.4%) participants responded to the web-based questionnaire. In a comparison between the two groups, the following barriers were significantly higher in the 10 years or fewer group: having sufficient medical documentation to write a report, knowing how to write a case report, determining the main case points and clinical message, knowing how to search the literature, knowing how to obtain literature, meeting the financial cost of accessing literature. Although there were no significant differences, only the lack of motivation to write papers was perceived as a barrier by the 11 years or more group.

conclusionsDetermining the main case points and clinical message, selecting an appropriate journal for submission, and having adequate time to write a paper were the major barriers to writing a case report. Paper-writing motivation was crucial for those with longer clinical experience and experience in writing papers. These barriers were significantly more pronounced among those with fewer than 10 years of clinical experience than among those with 11 or more years of experience. Providing targeted support in developing case points and clinical messages will lead to an increase in the rate of case report writing.

Indexed as

barriersclinical messagetraineestrainerswriting case reports

Identifiers

PMID40206495
PMCPMC11979862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.