Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206493›Full record

ArticleAperture neuro2023

Acquisition and processing methods of whole-brain layer-fMRI VASO and BOLD: The Kenshu dataset.

Kenshu Koiso, Anna K Müller, Kazuaki Akamatsu, Sebastian Dresbach, Christopher J Wiggins, Omer Faruk Gulban, Rainer Goebel, Yoichi Miyawaki, Benedikt A Poser, Laurentius Huber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aperture neuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kenshu KoisoFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL.
Anna K MüllerFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL.
Kazuaki AkamatsuGraduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo, Japan.
Sebastian DresbachFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL.
Christopher J WigginsImaging Core Facility, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Omer Faruk GulbanFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL.
Rainer GoebelFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL.
Yoichi MiyawakiGraduate School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo, Japan.
Benedikt A PoserFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL.
Laurentius HuberFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Foundations of MRI Corticography for mesoscale organization and neuronal circuitryR01MH111444 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FEINBERG, DAVID ALAN · 2016 to 2020
$5.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111444NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical depth-dependent functional magnetic resonance image (fMRI), also known as layer-fMRI, has the potential to capture directional neural information flow of brain computations within and across large-scale cortical brain networks. E.g., layer-fMRI can differentiate feedforward and feedback cortical input in hierarchically organized brain networks. Recent advancements in 3D-EPI sampling approaches and MR contrast generation strategies have allowed proof-of-principle studies showing that layer-fMRI can provide sufficient data quality for capturing laminar changes in functional connectivity. These studies have however not shown how reliable the signal is and how repeatable the respective results are. It is especially unclear whether whole-brain layer-fMRI functional connectivity protocols are widely applicable across common neuroscience-driven analysis approaches. Moreover, there are no established preprocessing fMRI methods that are optimized to work for whole-brain layer-fMRI datasets. In this work, we aimed to serve the field of layer-fMRI and build tools for future routine whole-brain layer-fMRI in application-based neuroscience research. We have developed publicly available sequences, acquisition protocols, and processing pipelines for whole-brain layer-fMRI. These protocols are validated across 60 hours of scanning in nine participants. Specifically, we identified and exploited methodological advancements for maximizing tSNR efficiency and test-retest reliability. We are sharing an extensive multi-modal whole-brain layer-fMRI dataset (20 scan hours of movie-watching in a single participant) for the purpose of benchmarking future method developments: The Kenshu dataset. With this dataset, we are also exemplifying the usefulness of whole brain layer-fMRI for commonly applied analysis approaches in modern cognitive neuroscience fMRI studies. This includes connectivity analyses, representational similarity matrix estimations, general linear model analyses, principal component analysis clustering, etc. We believe that this work paves the road for future routine measurements of directional functional connectivity across the entire brain.

Identifiers

PMID40206493
PMCPMC11981596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.