ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Beyond plaque segmentation: a combined radiomics-deep learning approach for automated CAD-RADS classification.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retrieval-augmented generation-enhanced large language models for comprehensive CAD-RADS 2.0 categorization from structured coronary CTA reports.Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is a leading cause of global mortality, accurate stenosis grading is crucial for treatment planning, it currently requires time-consuming manual assessment and suffers from interobserver variability. Few deep learning methods have been proposed for automated scoring, but none have explored combining radiomic and autoencoder (AE)-based features. This study develops a machine learning approach combining radiomic and AE-based features for stenosis grade evaluation from multiplanar reconstructed images (MPR) cardiac computed tomography (CCTA) images. Methods: The dataset comprised 2,548 CCTA-derived MPR images from 220 patients, classified as no-CAD, non-obstructive CAD or obstructive CAD. Sixty-four AE-based and 465 2D radiomic features, were processed separately or combined. The dataset was split into training (85%) and test (15%) sets. Relevant features were selected and input to a random forest classifier. A cascade pipeline stratified the three classes via two sub-tasks: (a) no CAD vs. CAD, and (b) nonobstructive vs. obstructive CAD. Results: The AE-based model identified 17 and 6 features as relevant for the sub-task (a) and (b), respectively, while 44 and 30 features were selected in the radiomic model. The two models reached an overall balanced accuracy of 0.68 and 0.82 on the test set, respectively. Fifteen and 35 features were indeed selected in the combined model which outperformed the single ones achieving on the test set an overall balanced accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.91, 0.91, and 0.94, respectively. Conclusion: Integration of radiomics and deep learning shows promising results for stenosis assessment in CAD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.