ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Predictors of delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning: a literature review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed encephalopathy after carbon monoxide poisoning in a 29-year-old female patient.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2026Article
- A clinical nomogram incorporating hyperhomocysteinemia for predicting severe delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning: a retrospective single-center study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Core Neuroinflammatory Pathways Contributing to Delayed Encephalopathy After Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Revealed by Multi-omics and Single Nucleus RNA-Seq.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Reciprocal regulation of GPNMB/HIF-1α for Inhibition of neuronal ferroptosis in delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Effect of retinoic acid on delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning: Role of the lncRNAZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Article
- Cortical microstructural change linked to clinical recovery in subacute delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning: a longitudinal case report.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delayed encephalopathy after acute carbon monoxide poisoning (DEACMP) is one of the severe complications that can occur after acute carbon monoxide poisoning (ACOP). The pathogenesis of DEACMP is complex, featuring a delitescence onset and poor prognosis. As a result, many scholars are concentrating on identifying predictors of DEACMP and evaluating their effects, including clinical characteristics, laboratory indicators, neuroelectrophysiology, imaging examination, and genetic susceptibility. However, current identified predictors lack consensus and their clinical application is limited. Therefore, we need to explore new predictors. Exosomes, the smallest extracellular vesicles (EVs) with nano-size, participate in both the physiological and pathological processes of the brain, and the changes in their content can provide valuable information for clinical diagnosis and evaluation of neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting that they may serve as a potential biomarker. However, the practicability of exosomes as biomarkers of DEACMP remains unclear. In the present review, we first introduced the pathogenesis of DEACMP and the currently identified predictors. Then, we also discussed the possibility of exosomes as the biomarkers of DEACMP, aiming to stimulate more attention and discussion on this topic, thereby providing meaningful insights for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.