Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206468›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Development of a clinical prediction model for poor treatment outcomes in the intensive phase in patients with initial treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Bin Lu, Yunzhen Shi, Mengqi Wang, Chenyuan Jin, Chenxin Liu, Xinling Pan, Xiang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bin LuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
Yunzhen ShiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
Mengqi WangDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
Chenyuan JinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
Chenxin LiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
Xinling PanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences Laboratory, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
Xiang ChenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences Laboratory, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A prediction model is hereby developed to identify poor treatment outcomes during the intensive phase in patients with initial treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Methods: The data of inpatients with pulmonary TB were collected from a tertiary hospital located in Southeastern China from July 2019 to December 2023. The included patients were divided into the modeling group and the validation group. The outcome indicator was based on a comparison of pulmonary CT findings before and after the two-month intensive phase of anti-TB treatment. In the modeling group, the independent risk factors of pulmonary TB patients were obtained through logistic regression analysis and then a prediction model was established. The discriminative ability (the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic, AUC), its calibration (GiViTI calibration chart), and its clinical applicability (decision curve analysis, DCA) were respectively evaluated. In addition, the prediction effectiveness was compared with that of the machine learning model. Results: A total of 1,625 patients were included in this study, and 343 patients had poor treatment outcomes in the intensive phase of anti-TB treatment. Logistic regression analysis identified several independent risk factors for poor treatment outcomes, including diabetes, cavities in the lungs, tracheobronchial TB, increased C-reactive protein, and decreased hemoglobin. The AUC values were 0.815 for the modeling group and 0.851 for the validation group. In the machine learning models, the AUC values of the random forest model and the integrated model were 0.821 and 0.835, respectively. Conclusion: The prediction model established in this study presents good performance in predicting poor treatment outcomes during the intensive phase in patients with pulmonary TB.

Indexed as

intensive phasemachine learning modelpoor treatment outcomeprediction modelpulmonary CTpulmonary tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID40206468
PMCPMC11978639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.