Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206409›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

ERP-based evidence for the independent processing of structural and functional action semantics.

Yanglan Yu, Qin Huang, Xudong Liu, Shiying Gao, Xuechen Mao, Anmin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yanglan YuSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Qin HuangSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Xudong LiuSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Shiying GaoSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Xuechen MaoDepartment of Physical Education, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Anmin LiSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the semantic processing and neural mechanisms of manipulative actions, categorized as structural actions and functional actions, were examined to assess whether these action types involve independent cognitive processes. Using a cue-stimulus paradigm with event-related potentials (ERPs), we analyzed neural responses to various manipulative actions. Manipulating the semantic congruency of structural actions (congruent vs. incongruent) and functional action types (wave vs. press) revealed distinct neural patterns. We observed distinct neural differences for functional actions in the 30-44 ms, 144-194 ms, 218-232 ms, 300-400 ms, and 562-576 ms windows. Early activation occurred in the left medial superior frontal gyrus, whereas sustained activity spread from the occipital and parietal regions to frontal regions between 144-194 ms and 300-400 ms. Late activation, occurring in the 562-576 ms window, was localized to the left middle frontal gyrus, right orbital inferior frontal gyrus, and right superior occipital gyrus. For structural actions, neural differences emerged in the 456-470 ms and 610-660 ms windows, which activated the parietal and temporal regions, including the left postcentral gyrus and right middle temporal gyrus. These findings suggest that the semantic processing of structural actions is partially independent of functional action cognition at the neural level.

Indexed as

action semantic processingcluster-based permutation analysisevent-related potentials (ERPs)functional actionsmanipulative actionsstructural actions

Identifiers

PMID40206409
PMCPMC11979279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.