Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206312›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2023

Synergies and Challenges in the Preclinical and Clinical Implementation of Pathology Artificial Intelligence Applications.

Hammad A Qureshi, Runjan Chetty, Jogile Kuklyte, Karl Ratcliff, Maria Morrissey, Caitriona Lyons, Mairin Rafferty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Digital and Computational Pathology: What a Time to Be Alive!Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hammad A QureshiDeciphex, DCU Alpha, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Runjan ChettyDeciphex, DCU Alpha, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jogile KuklyteDeciphex, DCU Alpha, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Karl RatcliffDeciphex, DCU Alpha, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Maria MorrisseyDeciphex, DCU Alpha, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Caitriona LyonsDeciphex, DCU Alpha, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
Mairin RaffertyDeciphex, DCU Alpha, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent introduction of digitalization in pathology has disrupted the field greatly with the potential to change the area immensely. Digital pathology has created the potential of applying advanced quantitative analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) to the domain. In this study, we present an overview of what pathology AI applications have the greatest potential of widespread adoption in the preclinical domain and subsequently, in the clinical setting. We also discuss the major challenges in AI adoption being faced by the field of digital and computational pathology. We review the research literature in the domain and present a detailed analysis of the most promising areas of digital and computational pathology AI research and identify applications that are likely to see the first adoptions of AI technology. Our analysis shows that certain areas and fields of application have received more attention and can potentially affect the field of digital and computational pathology more favorably, leading to the advancement of the field. We also present the main challenges that are faced by the field and provide a comparative analysis of various aspects that are likely to influence the field for the long term in the future.

Identifiers

PMID40206312
PMCPMC11975742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.