ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2023
Hemorrhage Evaluation and Detector System for Underserved Populations: HEADS-UP.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing Inequalities in Stroke Events-Hemorrhagic Disparities (RISE-HD): a 10-Year Longitudinal Study in Florida.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- SAHVAI-3D and 4D: Automated AI Volumetric Measurement of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage on Noncontrast Head CT.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Use of artificial intelligence in the management of stroke: scoping review.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To create a rapid, cloud-based, and deployable machine learning (ML) method named hemorrhage evaluation and detector system for underserved populations, potentially across the Mayo Clinic enterprise, then expand to involve underserved areas and detect the 5 subtypes of intracranial hemorrhage (IH). Methods: We used Radiological Society of North America dataset for IH detection. We made 4 total iterations using Google Cloud Vertex AutoML. We trained an AutoML model with 2000 images, followed by 6000 images from both IH positive and negative classes. Pixel values were measured by the Hounsfield units, presenting a width of 80 Hounsfield and a level of 40 Hounsfield as the bone window. This was followed by a more detailed image preprocessing approach by combining the pixel values from each of the brain, subdural, and soft tissue window-based gray-scale images into R(red)-channel, G(green)-channel, and B(blue)-channel images to boost the binary IH classification performance. Four experiments with AutoML were applied to study the effects of training sample size and image preprocessing on model performance. Results: Out of the 4 AutoML experiments, the best-performing model was the fourth experiment, where 95.80% average precision, 91.40% precision, and 91.40% recall were achieved. On the basis of this analysis, our binary IH classifier hemorrhage evaluation and detector system for underserved populations appeared both accurate and performed well. Conclusion: Hemorrhage evaluation and detector system for underserved populations is a rapid, cloud-based, deployable ML method to detect IH. This tool can help expedite the care of patients with IH in resource-limited hospitals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.