Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206310›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2023

Deep Learning for Computed Tomography Assessment of Hepatic Fibrosis and Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.

Numan Kutaiba, Ariel Dahan, Mark Goodwin, Adam Testro, Gary Egan, Ruth Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Numan KutaibaDepartment of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
Ariel DahanDepartment of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
Mark GoodwinDepartment of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
Adam TestroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.
Gary EganMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton VIC, Australia.
Ruth LimDepartment of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies were identified using deep learning artificial intelligence methods for the analysis of computed tomography images in the assessment of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. A systematic review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies protocol to evaluate the accuracy of deep learning algorithms for this objective (PROSPERO CRD 42023366201). A literature search was conducted on Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases. The search was conducted with a timeline from January 1, 2000,through November 13, 2022. Our search resulted in 3877 studies for screening, which yielded 6 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. All studies were retrospective. Three studies performed internal validation, and 2 studies performed external validation. Four studies used image classification algorithms, whereas 2 studies used image segmentation algorithms to derive volumetric measurements of the liver and spleen. Accuracy of the algorithms was variable in diagnosing significant and advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, with the area under the curve ranging from 0.63 to 0.97. Deep learning algorithms using computed tomography images have the potential to classify fibrosis stages. Heterogeneity in cohorts and methodologies limits the generalizability of these studies.

Identifiers

PMID40206310
PMCPMC11975692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.