ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2023
Causal Deep Neural Network-Based Model for First-Line Hypertension Management.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy: applications and perspectives.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Critical review of patient outcome study in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.Meta-radiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Revolutionizing Cardiology through Artificial Intelligence-Big Data from Proactive Prevention to Precise Diagnostics and Cutting-Edge Treatment-A Comprehensive Review of the Past 5 Years.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Better Blood Pressure Control for Stroke Patients in the ICU: A Deep Reinforcement Learning with Supervised Guidance Approach for Adaptive Infusion Rate Tuning.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning model that predicts the most successful antihypertensive treatment for an individual. Patients and Methods: The causal, deep neural network-based model was trained on data from 16,917 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients attending Mayo Clinic's primary care practices from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2021. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of primary hypertension, blood pressure and creatinine measurements before antihypertensive treatment, treatment within 9 months of diagnosis, and at least 1 year of follow up. The primary outcome was model performance in predicting the likelihood of a successful antihypertensive treatment 1 year from the start of treatment. Treatment success was defined as achieving blood pressure control with no moderate or severe adverse effects. Model validation and guideline agreement was assessed on 1000 patients. Results: In the training set of 16,917 participants (60.8±14.7 years; 8344 [49.3%] women), 33.8% achieved blood pressure control without moderate or severe adverse effects for at least a year with initial treatment. The most common treatment was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (39.1% average success), and the most successful was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-thiazide combination (44.4% average success). Our custom-built causal, deep neural network-based model exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting individualized treatment success with a precision of 51.7%, recall of 44.4%, and F1 score of 47.8%. Compared with actual physician practice on the validation set (77.9% agreement), the algorithm aligned with the Eighth Joint National Committee hypertension guidelines 95.7% of the time. Conclusion: A machine learning algorithm can accurately predict the likelihood of antihypertensive treatment success and help personalize hypertension management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.