ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2023
Demonstration of High Diagnostic Accuracy for Cerebral Ischemia in a Large Academic Hub-and -Spoke Telestroke Network.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the initial telestroke consultation in a large academic hub-and-spoke telemedicine network. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study includes all patients evaluated for cerebral ischemia through video telestroke consultation in a large academic hub-and-spoke telemedicine network from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. A detailed chart review was conducted to identify the initial suspected diagnosis and final diagnosis. Cerebral ischemia was defined as acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. All other diagnoses were defined as stroke mimics. Data were organized into continuous and categorical variables. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), and likelihood ratio (LR+) for the telestroke-consultation diagnosis were calculated while using the final diagnosis as the gold standard diagnosis. Results: A total of 1043 patients met the inclusion criteria. The final diagnosis of cerebral ischemia was made in 63.5% of all patients (539 of the 1043 with acute ischemic stroke,123 of the 1043 with transient ischemic attack). Stroke mimic was diagnosed in 36.5% patients (381 of the 1043). The sensitivity and specificity of telestroke evaluation for diagnosis of cerebral ischemia were 97.1% and 81.4%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 90.1%, and negative predictive value was 94.2%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 91.4%, with an LR+ of 5.21 and AUC of 0.89. Conclusion: This study highlights the high diagnostic accuracy of telestroke providers in diagnosing cerebral ischemia. Further research exploring the application of teleneurology in the nonstroke setting and other medical subspecialties is warranted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.