ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2023
Conceptualization of Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Patients with Complex Medical Illness on Hospital Dismissal.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Medicine in the Management of Heart Failure: From Reactive Care to Predictive, Pathophysiology-Driven Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Acute Kidney Injury Survivor Remote Patient Monitoring: A Single Center's Experience and an Effectiveness Evaluation.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the creation of a scalable framework for a Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) program tied to a large medical practice. Patients and Methods: In July 2020, at Mayo Clinic Rochester, we initiated the process to combine human-centered design, health systems engineering, and clinical expertise to develop and refine RPM programs and explore new medical conditions where RPM could be beneficial. We report on the creation of the overarching RPM program, the development of a hybrid nursing model, the technology used for each population, and the lessons learned throughout the process. Results: Four pilot programs for hospitalized patients with cirrhosis, acute kidney injury (AKI), post-pancreatectomy, and post-gastroenterology (GI) procedures were launched. The 4 programs enrolled a range from 0 patients (post-GI procedures) to 91 patients over 5 months (AKI) for RPM programs ranging from 30 days to 96.5 days in average duration. Three of the programs continue enrollment (cirrhosis, AKI, and post-pancreatectomy), and one program was discontinued. Conclusion: RPM can uniquely facilitate the transition from hospital to home, decrease hospital length of stay, and optimize hospital capacity and staffing resources in select scenarios. To achieve positive results at the health care system level, RPM interventions require a change in the model of care. However, not all care models or medical conditions lend themselves to RPM, which should be explored in pilot testing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.