Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206265›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Reading Performances in Highly Myopic Patients and Correlation with the Topography of Atrophic Maculopathy.

Matteo Mario Carlà, Carlos Mateo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matteo Mario CarlàOphthalmology Department, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS," Rome, Italy.
Carlos MateoVitreoretinal Surgery Department, Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular (IMO), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate how the topography of atrophic patches influences monocular and binocular reading performances in eyes with pathologic myopia. Design: Prospective single-center observational investigation. Participants: Sixty-two patients (112 eyes) affected by pathologic myopia (axial length [AXL] >26.5 mm). Only college graduates aged <65 years were selected. Methods: All patients underwent monocular and binocular reading evaluation using Colenbrander Reading Charts, taking into account the reading time and missed words/errors. Moreover, eyes underwent fundus photography and autofluorescence: the presence of chorioretinal atrophy within the central, 4 inner, and 4 outer ETDRS grid subfields was reviewed. Main Outcome Measures: Reading acuity (logarithm of the reading acuity determination [logRAD]); reading speed (words per minute [wpm]); percentage of errors/missed word; correlation with ETDRS subfield atrophy localization. Results: Mean AXL was 31.45 ± 2.21 mm. Monocularly, mean reading acuity was 0.37 ± 0.35 logRAD with an 8% ± 11% rate of missed or wrong words, whereas reading speed was 71.5 ± 27.8 wpm (range 25-125 wpm). Binocularly, mean reading acuity was 0.16 ± 0.16 logRAD with 5% ± 7% of missed or wrong words, whereas reading speed was 88.2 ± 18.0 wpm. Reading acuity was significantly associated with the presence of chorioretinal atrophy in the foveal central circle in univariate and multivariate analysis ( Conclusions: In highly myopic eyes, we reported a significant relationship between the topography of patchy chorioretinal atrophy and reading performance. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

High myopiaMyopic atrophic maculopathyReading acuityReading performanceReading speed

Identifiers

PMID40206265
PMCPMC11981730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.